[ad_1]
Through the first half of Thursday’s Western Conference Finals sport, referees referred to as a flagrant-1 foul on Lakers’ guard D’Angelo Russell.
Russell was trying to dam Nuggets guard Jamal Murray’s layup as he drove to the basket in transition within the first quarter of Sport 2 of the Convention Finals.
Russell’s left arm appeared to make contact with Murray’s face, nevertheless it appeared just like the Lakers’ guard was making an attempt to hit the basketball.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
DAngelo Russell #1 of the Los Angeles Lakers dribbles the ball throughout Sport 2 of the Western Convention Finals 2023 NBA Playoffs on Might 18, 2023 on the Ball Enviornment in Denver, Colorado. (Picture by Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE through Getty Photographs)
After the referees huddled to debate the play, they dominated that Russell had dedicated an offense that was worthy of a flagrant 1 foul name.
The decision resulted in two free throw makes an attempt for the Nuggets, each of which had been good.
LEBRON JAMES STUNS NBA WORLD AS HE LOSES BALL ON BREAKAWAY DUNK ATTEMPT
Los Angeles led Denver by three factors at time of the foul name, which occurred with slightly below three minutes remaining within the sport’s opening quarter.
LeBron James, who was on the bench on the time, was left in disbelief.
James was seen mouthing the phrases “What did he do?”
A lot of the arguments concerning the play revolved round whether or not Russell wound up his arm earlier than he made contact with Murray.
ESPN guidelines analyst Steve Javie agreed with the officers name, whereas broadcasters Mark Jackson and Jeff Van Gundy voiced their oppositions concerning the resolution.
D’Angelo Russell #1 of the Los Angeles Lakers dribbles the ball throughout the sport in opposition to the Denver Nuggets throughout Sport 2 of the 2023 NBA Playoffs Western Convention Finals on Might 18, 2023, on the Ball Enviornment in Denver, Colorado. (Picture by Garrett Ellwood/NBAE through Getty Photographs)
However, the flagrant foul name sparked a fury of reactions on social media, with some backing the referee’s resolution and different questioning whether or not the proper name was made.
The Los Angeles Lakers look on throughout Sport 2 of the Western Convention Finals 2023 NBA Playoffs on Might 18, 2023 on the Ball Enviornment in Denver, Colorado. (Picture by Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE through Getty Photographs)
The customarily outspoken Golden State Warriors ahead Draymond Inexperienced appeared to categorize the decision as “smooth.”
ESPN host Frank Isola identified the obvious contact to Russell’s face.
Former NFL quarterback and present ESPN host Robert Griffin III believed Russell merely dedicated a “good foul.”
One Twitter consumer stated Russell was “contesting” Murray’s shot try.
One other Twitter consumer sided with the referees.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
No matter what aspect of the talk anybody stands on, the questionable name actually reignited conversations concerning the variations between a standard foul, a flagrant 1 and a flagrant 2 foul.
[ad_2]
Source link
