[ad_1]
Rebekah Vardy has trademarked the phrase “Wagatha Christie” – regardless of the very fact she did not give you the pun.
The play on phrases emerged quickly after Coleen Rooney launched an Instagram put up that accused Vardy of leaking tales to the press.
Mrs Rooney’s online sleuthing – which concerned posting false tales and limiting who may see them – drew comparisons to Agatha Christie, the famed crime novelist.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
The social media drama subsequently sparked a high-profile libel trial – and Vardy was ordered to pay Rooney’s authorized prices after losing the case.
Mental property specialists consider Vardy could now use the “Wagatha Christie” model to money in – and she or he may command a charge from anybody who makes use of the time period.
Data from the Mental Property Workplace recommend the trademark may find yourself getting used on garments, magnificence merchandise, mugs, glasses, jewelry and even non-alcoholic drinks.
And given how Vardy was ordered to pay 90% of Rooney’s authorized prices – which were rumoured to reach £1.5m – this earnings may go a protracted solution to softening the blow.
The trademark is already creating complications for producers of the West Finish play Vardy V Rooney: The Wagatha Christie Trial.
Learn extra:
Are high-profile lawsuits really worth it for celebs?
The 12 most shocking celebrity moments of 2022
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
It is a “verbatim production” that makes use of Excessive Court docket transcripts to dramatise the authorized battle between the 2 footballers’ wives.
In an announcement, the producers stated: “This story continues to have extra twists and turns than an Agatha Christie thriller and this morning’s information that Rebekah Vardy has trademarked the time period ‘Wag*tha Chr*stie’ is the newest plot growth.
“Performances of Vardy V Rooney: The Wag*tha Chr*stie Trial proceed as deliberate within the West Finish and on tour and we might be delighted for Mrs Vardy to return and see the present.”
Comic Dan Atkinson could have been the primary to coin the phrase again in October 2019, and his play on phrases garnered hundreds of retweets.
After studying about Vardy’s trademark, he tweeted: “Effectively this is not splendid, is it?”
[ad_2]
Source link
